and excludes online gift card purchases and orders made on third‑party apps. Panera Bread: 3% Daily Cash is not available at Panera locations outside the U.S. Nike: 3% Daily Cash is not available at Nike-branded stores outside the United States. ◊ Merchant offers may change at any time.** Accepting an Apple Card after your application is approved will result in a hard inquiry, which may impact your credit score.Credit Card Satisfaction Study of customers’ satisfaction with credit card issuers. * Apple Card Issuer, Goldman Sachs received the highest score among midsize credit card issuers in the J.D.They could have just flagged the SDPD entry for review.ĭoratheora: Someone should check if Fullerton PD edited their Wikipedia. It’s a conflict of interest, unethical and dishonest. Bias is a thing.Īnomicofficedrone: Yes, bias is a thing, but whitewashing your wiki entry isn’t a matter of bias. From your point of view the police made it factually incorrect. Patranus: Why shouldn’t the San Diego Police Department be able to edit objective information on Wikipedia? How is it any different than edits from any number of social justice organizations?Īnomicofficedrone: What’s objective about only removing content that makes you look bad?Ģ06dude: From the police point of view the entry was factually incorrect and needed to be fixed. Raudskeggr: All of these PR edits that we catch makes me wonder how many slip by unnoticed.
They’ll openly engage in edit warring (big nono) to get both themselves and the person they’re edit warring with banned, and then get one of their admin friends to unban them within 24 hours so they can go back to “protecting” their favorite article from changes.
They’ll call new editors who disagree with them “Single Purpose Accounts” so that they can be banned. They’ll regularly declare dissenting sources “unreliable” while citing blatant clickbait like Gawker as reliable sources. People are editing Wiki to push agendas and relying on their admin friends to cover for them/each other. Vonmonologue: This kind of thing happens all the time. While I’m generally suspicious of any PD editing their own wikiepedia page I still think its stupid to say they “got caught editing wikipedia.” The website is editable. One man “getting caught” is another man “correcting an entry”. The whole, “getting caught editing wikipedia” is entirely up to the eye of the beholder. editable! Just because they are writing history in a different way than someone else doesn’t mean its wrong. Thecatgoesmoo: There’s nothing to be held accountable for. They know no one will hold them to account for censorship. Even if you get caught changing history, history is still changed. They don’t care because there’s no reason for them to care. They are humans, but they should be placed under stronger standards about honestly and loyaulty, toward the community not each others. Than some police officers thinks it’s better to rug sweep than to face their errors. Fighting misinformation is half of what Wikipedia is, unfortunately.
#BUY CAC CARD READER FOR MAC SAN ANTONIO FREE#
Adding new laws would be an unneccessary complication on free speech and limit the ability of Wikipedia to function.ĭogdriving: Does this really shock anyone? This kind of stuff literally happens to most Wikipedia pages about real life people or organizations. Also, Wikipedia is built on a highly open platform. Wikipedia already does a good job of catching and fixing this stuff. I know there’s no legal or even wiki-policy related wording stopping them, I’m just saying there should be.ĬitizenPremier: I agree it’s a scummy thing to do, but I disagree about how it should be illegal. They’re not silencing an author or publisher, they’re attempting to silence the community as a whole. Wikipedia is community run, and an attempt at keeping the facts straight as opposed to decided upon by a publisher. Theth1rdchild: If anything, what they’re doing here is morally worse. If they were banned and were working to circumvent a ban, that might be different. Wikipedia’s policies allow anyone to edit til they get banned. But that’s just me.ĬitizenPremier: It really isn’t the same.
Theth1rdchild: Somehow I don’t think it should be legal for them to walk into a library and rip out pages of a book on how bad they are.
0 kommentar(er)
